COBIT self-assessment guide using COBIT / Subjects: COBIT (Information technology management standard) · Information technology > Evaluation. The COBIT PAM adapts the existing COBIT content into an ISO An alignment of COBIT’s maturity model scale with the international standard Assessor qualifications and experiential requirements .. (COSO Guidance ). ISACA has designed and created COBIT® Self-assessment Guide: Using COBIT ® 5 (the ‘Work’) primarily as an assessor . The Measurement Framework.

Author: Shakat Zulkikora
Country: Rwanda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 12 September 2017
Pages: 408
PDF File Size: 19.85 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.49 Mb
ISBN: 674-9-76439-887-3
Downloads: 93042
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yogami

For each assessor, records to prove the participation in the assessment are produced. Are work products appropriately identified, documented and controlled? There is evidence that the intent of base practice is being performed.

Holdings: COBIT self-assessment guide

Performance of the process is planned and monitored. Evidence of process capability may be more abstract than evidence of process performance. Okay, Usnig understand Learn more.

Knowledge, skills and experience: Which processes are being assessed? Share buttons are a little bit lower. What is the relative risk if the gap assezsor assessed capability at each maturity level is Substantial, Significant or Slight, e. This attribute is fully achieved when the process achieves its defined outcomes. DS1-BP8 Create a service improvement plan. Focus the presentation on defining the capability of the processes assessed.

ISACA’s COBIT® Assessment Programme

Input Process Output Brief the organisational unit on the performance of the assessment: Briefing The assessment team leader ensures that the cpbit team understands the assessment: To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy.

An outcome is an artefact, a significant change of state or the meeting of specified constraints. Define the scope of the assessment: Asesssor will walk through an example of these shortly.


Collect evidence of process capability for each process within the scope.

From level 2 onwards you are no longer using the PRM; you are looking primarily at the attribute goals or objectives, called generic outcomes and generic practices and sssessor work products in the PAM section 4. Have them approved by the sponsor The objective of the initiation phase is conit ensure that there is a common understanding with the sponsor on the purpose and scope of the assessment, and to identify the individuals with the appropriate competencies to ensure a successful assessment.

Requirements for the work products have been defined.

They represent a common starting point for assessment, which increases the consistency of assessor judgment and enhances the repeatability of the results. Step 1 Identify relevant business drivers for the IT processes assessment.

Review and obtain acceptance of the plan.

Ensure that the staff assdssor understand what is being undertaken and their role in the process. These wssessor available in the tool kit There is a six Step Selection Process: Custom Statutory Programs Chapter 3. Define how the assessment data will be collected, recorded, stored, usibg and presented with reference to the assessment tool.

In addition, simplified guidance has been developed in a Self-assessment Guide to completing assessments for those wanting to perform a simple, judgement based self assessment as a precursor to a more formal compliant assessment. To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors.

The assessment results will also be shared with any parties e. Work products are reviewed and adjusted as necessary to meet the requirements. Determine the assessment activities. Auth with social network: The rating is based on data validated in the previous activity.


Are responsibilities and authorities for performing the process defined, assigned and communicated? In some cases, the evidence of process performance may be used as evidence of process capability.

ISACA publishes COBIT process assessment model

Recall, it is highly unlikely an enterprise would assess assesspr 34 COBIT processes, so a scoping tool kit has been provided, see next slides for outline and scoping example.

Observed areas of strength and weakness Findings of high risk, i. Responsibilities and authorities for performing assfssor process are defined, assigned and communicated. Interfaces between the involved parties are managed to ensure effective communication and clear assignment of responsibility. Production of an object A significant change of state; Meeting of specified constraints, e. The assessor then reaches a conclusion as to the uzing to which the attribute has been achieved.

Detail how the assessment will meet all the requirements in the standard. Registration Forgot your password? Present the assessment results to the participants. Assemble the Assessment Record.

Initiation Identify the sponsor and define the purpose of the assessment: Are resources and information necessary for performing the process identified, made available, allocated and used?

Present the guode results to the sponsor. Ensure that the data collected is correct and objective and that the validated data provides complete coverage of the assessment scope. All other levels and attributes PA2.